Marking criteria –
Research and Planning
ShamilMattu – 7th March
2014
|
Skills
|
Level
|
Comment
|
|
Planning
and research evidence
|
2
|
You have uploaded some examples of front covers and some
annotation and analysis is evident.
|
|
Research
into similar products and a potential target audience
|
2
|
Some evidence of research into other examples and some
annotation.
|
|
Work on
shotlists, layouts, drafting, storyboarding and scripting.
|
2
|
Some evidence of drafting of front cover but little
comment on them. Some shots taken and some comment on them.
|
|
Time
management
|
1
|
Still missing quite a bit of work.
|
|
Organisation
of actors, locations, costumes or props.
|
2
|
Some evidence of organisation for shots taken.
|
|
Care in
presentation of research and planning.
|
2
|
Some structure and organisation
|
|
Targets
|
|
Shamil, you have made some
improvements but there is still work to do. You need to analyse and annotate
in much more detail. You need to consider the effect of the ideas used and
evaluate aspects of features used. Are they successful? If so how? Will you
make use of them? The draft of your front cover also needs more detail – you
need to consider which features from your analysis you are using and what
effect you hope they will achieve. You need to also provide more comment on
your shots, why are you using these particular shots? Why are they
successful? Overall mark – 8/20
|
Marking criteria –
Production
|
Skills
|
Level
|
Comment
|
|
Producing
material appropriate for the target audience and task.
|
1
|
No
evidence of this
|
|
Showing
understanding of conventions of layout and page design.
|
1
|
Some
evidence of this in your analysis and draft.
|
|
Showing
awareness of the need for variety in fonts and text size.
|
1
|
Some
comment on this in your annotation but no consideration of it in your own
work.
|
|
Accurately
using language and register.
|
1
|
Some
comment on relevant features in your annotation.
|
|
Using ICT
appropriately.
|
1
|
Some use
of ICT but little range.
|
|
Appropriately
integrating illustration and text.
|
1
|
No
evidence of this
|
|
Shooting a
variety of material appropriate to the task set.
|
1
|
Some
evidence of shots taken but little comment on how and why you will use them.
|
|
Manipulating
photographs as appropriate to the context for presentation, including
cropping and resizing.
|
1
|
No
evidence of this.
|
Marking criteria – Evaluation
|
Skills
|
Level
|
Comment
|
|
Use of
digital technology or ICT in evaluation
|
1
|
No
evidence of this.
|
|
Understanding
of their development from preliminary to full task.
|
|
Not
appropriate yet.
|
|
Understanding
of issues around audiences, institution, technology, representation, forms
and conventions in relation to production.
|
1
|
No
evidence of this
|
|
Ability to
refer to the choices made and outcomes.
|
1
|
Some
comment on choices you will make based on analysis but little explanation as
to why.
|
|
Ability to
communicate.
|
1
|
Basic
errors in written communication. Proofread!
|
|
Targets
|
|
Still little evidence of evaluation
Shamil. You need to be evaluating after each stage of the process. What have
you done? What have you learnt and how will this help you in the final
stages? You must be doing this on a weekly basis. There is still no evidence of any audience
research or evaluation of how this has informed you.
Overall mark – 2/20
|
No comments:
Post a Comment